From the very beginning, the existing storylines as to how the Titanic and Hindenburg failed have never been confirmed by a scientific analyses nor have the supposed acts ever been duplicated. Unfortunately, during the years hence, the public's knowledge regarding the actual performance of these majestic and sound engineering designs has dramatically waned. The fact is, both the Titanic and the Hindenburg performed to near perfection.
And yet most unexpectedly, both were brought to an inglorious end, and now their designs have almost become completely forgotten. But recently new information relating to the wreckage of the Titanic has come to light and it provides a ton of new information.
Let's start with the discovery of Titanic's wreckage in 1985 when it was learned that her hull was in two completely separate pieces. Wow! That was a big revelation! But in 2005 we got even more mind-blowing information. Two new and gigantic pieces of Titanic's hull were found and photographed by two independent divers, Chatterton and Kohler. Both pieces were from the bottom of Titanic's double bilged hull and had been completely ripped free!
This information destroys the iceberg theory, but few have heard the information. Why wouldn't the mainstream news announce this incredible new piece of information about the Titanic? Everyone loves the story of the Titanic. Is there some kind of coverup of the real events taking place here?
Today's new information reveals that the Titanic was not lost due to an accident or faulty design. As you read on you will learn that neither the Titanic nor the Hindenburg were lost due to accidents but were in fact deliberately demolished.
This means that neither the Titanic nor the Hindenburg were removed from the public because they failed; they were removed for another reason.
Why would anyone have wanted to remove these two great inventions from society?
The truth of the matter was both designs, coal-powered steamships and diesel-powered airships, were deliberately disappeared from public service decades before normal retirement or replacement would have normally occurred because they were so fuel efficient. This "forced retirement" is now well documented by the fact in both cases they were not only replaced prematurely but by inferior designs. As it turns out, the preferred replacements just happened to consume more petroleum that required expensive processing.
Let's review the Titanic. The story is now 106 years old encompassing innumerable articles, books and movie remakes. These include side stories and trivia regarding her design, construction, accommodations, passengers, decorations, safety features, lifeboats, navigation and iceberg encounter. Along the way scientists, engineers and naval architects have explained her structural failure as having been caused by hull-material weaknesses, visibility issues, rivet manufacture, cold water effects, a rudder that was too small, a design that was too big, etc.
And don't forget the novelists who entwined bad luck and karma into the most famous maritime disaster of modern times. The books, movies and documentaries that exist today must number in the thousands, making the Titanic one of the most studied and documented stories in the history of earth. And so it seems the accepted story has come about from leaving not one stone unturned regarding Titanic's tragic sinking. Until now.
This screen shot is just one of over twenty pages of images for books written about the Titanic. There must be thousands of them! The 1997 "Titanic" movie alone has now grossed over 1 billion dollars.
Now you may be wondering why anyone would want to question a story that has already been so massively documented and researched, with all of it agreeing with the same conclusion; that an iceberg sank the Titanic? What if the truth has yet to be delineated? The most recent evidence from the wreckage makes this a certainty.
The New York City College of Marine Forensics is validated as the official authority by the Woods Hole Institute and the Robert Ballard Group. In other words they are the peer reviewed final say regarding Titanic's demise. Since 2012 the official explanation from the NYCC was revised as to how the Titanic sank, and this new ruling threw the existing explanations into turmoil.
Titanic historians; take note: The "high-angle-break-theory", you know the one depicted in the 1997 movie "Titanic", has been tossed out! The sinking of the Titanic has now occurred according to the "low angle break theory". This means that not only the 1997 Titanic movie but every other movie, book and newspaper article made and written between 1912 and 2012 has been rendered erroneous!
Does anyone know this?
Today's story? Full of holes!
6 Separate "cuts" in 6 compartments HOWEVER, Ice does not cut steel;
Catastrophic damage to the hull. HOWEVER, Nobody above or below decks heard anything.
Damage to hull along 300 feet. WOULD REQUIRE 8 seconds of contact at 22 knots; IMPOSSIBLE!
The ship went down in 160 min. HOWEVER, nobody felt a collision or impact!
5 Compartments needed to flood. HOWEVER each would have needed a 2 to 4 sq. ft. HOLE! (If just one compartment flooded slowly, other compartments would not have filled for hours).
5 Forward Compartments were breached. HOWEVER boiler room 6 was in compartment 5! (This would have erupted within minutes of the breach).
6 Separate "cuts" in 6 compartments HOWEVER, Ice does not cut steel;
Catastrophic damage to the hull. HOWEVER, Nobody above or below decks heard anything.
Damage to hull along 300 feet. WOULD REQUIRE 8 seconds of contact at 22 knots; IMPOSSIBLE!
The ship went down in 160 min. HOWEVER, nobody felt a collision or impact!
5 Compartments needed to flood. HOWEVER each would have needed a 2 to 4 sq. ft. HOLE! (If just one compartment flooded slowly, other compartments would not have filled for hours).
5 Forward Compartments were breached. HOWEVER boiler room 6 was in compartment 5! (This would have erupted within minutes of the breach).
Above photograph courtesy: ScienceAlert.com
Drawing at right courtesy: NYCity College of Technology
And this is just the beginning of what has become a major unraveling of the story! As a result of new knowledge gained from recent dives to the wreckage in 2005, the experts in charge of deciphering the latest data have published a report stating that the Titanic broke apart on the surface while in the process of sinking. The public has not caught on to the fact that as a result of these new findings, a totally new story-line about what caused so much destruction in the first place has emerged.
The original hit-an-iceberg-damaging-five-forward-compartments-theory has been retained as proper Titanic fact. But now, on top of this, an impossible scenario has been proposed. Now the Titanic not only sinks from striking an iceberg, but she also breaks herself into five major pieces. That's right, she breaks up during the process of sinking!
This is a huge add-on to an existing story which was flimsy from the beginning and never proven! The fact of the matter is, after 113 years the actual truth about the Titanic has never been more obscured!
Now hold onto your seat again. The pieces of Titanic's hull are nearly a half mile apart on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. Divers and forensics experts have concluded that in order for the separate hull and bilge pieces to have landed this far apart, they would have needed to be completely separated from the main hull at or near the surface. What could cause a steel ship with 10 decks to completely rip itself apart?
Drawing at right courtesy: NYCity College of Technology
And this is just the beginning of what has become a major unraveling of the story! As a result of new knowledge gained from recent dives to the wreckage in 2005, the experts in charge of deciphering the latest data have published a report stating that the Titanic broke apart on the surface while in the process of sinking. The public has not caught on to the fact that as a result of these new findings, a totally new story-line about what caused so much destruction in the first place has emerged.
The original hit-an-iceberg-damaging-five-forward-compartments-theory has been retained as proper Titanic fact. But now, on top of this, an impossible scenario has been proposed. Now the Titanic not only sinks from striking an iceberg, but she also breaks herself into five major pieces. That's right, she breaks up during the process of sinking!
This is a huge add-on to an existing story which was flimsy from the beginning and never proven! The fact of the matter is, after 113 years the actual truth about the Titanic has never been more obscured!
Now hold onto your seat again. The pieces of Titanic's hull are nearly a half mile apart on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. Divers and forensics experts have concluded that in order for the separate hull and bilge pieces to have landed this far apart, they would have needed to be completely separated from the main hull at or near the surface. What could cause a steel ship with 10 decks to completely rip itself apart?
We've actually known this since 2006 from the Chatterton/Kohler dive of 2005. They revealed beyond the shadow of a doubt that Titanic's hull suffered damage way beyond merely striking an iceberg. As a result of finding huge chunks of the hull that came from the bottom the "authorities" have had to come up with a new set of forces that caused her to become up and scattered! Don't forget, the Titanic supposedly sank during a calm night on a calm ocean.
Today, the "forces" they found to account for the Titanic breaking herself into pieces in the act of sinking are a result of tilting the ship downward. Look at the chart at top right. This is the "Low Angle Break Theory" and it has superseded all previous theories. The original break-angle (from the 1997 Titanic movie) has been dramatically reduced.
How did they ever get us to believe this steel ship broke herself apart at such a low tilt angle? They really didn't, because they continue to misrepresent the actual tilt angle with erroneous documentaries. Few people know that the 1997 "high-angle-break-theory" has been thrown out along with all the previous ones! So why are they still hanging on to the 1997 Titanic movie depiction when it has been disproven?
I invite you to watch all of the recent video documentaries. Watch them and ask yourself, "Don't these breakup scenarios actually reveal that the Titanic was intentionally demolished?"
And then consider how would you attempt to separate and scatter pieces of riveted steel plate across the ocean bottom, using whatever methods are available today. You soon come to the conclusion that to sink the Titanic by any means is very difficult.
Today, the "forces" they found to account for the Titanic breaking herself into pieces in the act of sinking are a result of tilting the ship downward. Look at the chart at top right. This is the "Low Angle Break Theory" and it has superseded all previous theories. The original break-angle (from the 1997 Titanic movie) has been dramatically reduced.
How did they ever get us to believe this steel ship broke herself apart at such a low tilt angle? They really didn't, because they continue to misrepresent the actual tilt angle with erroneous documentaries. Few people know that the 1997 "high-angle-break-theory" has been thrown out along with all the previous ones! So why are they still hanging on to the 1997 Titanic movie depiction when it has been disproven?
I invite you to watch all of the recent video documentaries. Watch them and ask yourself, "Don't these breakup scenarios actually reveal that the Titanic was intentionally demolished?"
And then consider how would you attempt to separate and scatter pieces of riveted steel plate across the ocean bottom, using whatever methods are available today. You soon come to the conclusion that to sink the Titanic by any means is very difficult.
The Hindenburg Connection
The Hindenburg was no ordinary flying machine. She utilized an effective form of anti-gravity and employed diesel engines, not ones that consumed high-octane aviation fuel. And neither was the Titanic an ordinary sea-going passenger carrier. She ran on coal at $1.00 per ton and could have run on any cheap fuel that would burn.
Today it is important that we learn about these events because the same corporate games are taking place and they have grown in size and attained even greater influence. Now, hang on for the second part of the story to learn why the Hindenburg also played a strategic role in the development of Trans-Atlantic Passenger service, and was very much in competition with flying mechanisms that are still used today. Could it be that both the Titanic and the Hindenburg were destroyed for the same reason (such as fuel efficiency beyond what the petrol oligarchs wanted)?
If we knew that one was deliberately destroyed (Titanic, which represented the most efficient sea travel), shouldn't we investigate the other (Hindenburg, which represented the most efficient air travel) to make sure that her demise was not engineered as well? What if I told you the analyses contained within this book reveals the same motive and a similar pattern of destruction!
If they were destroyed for the same reason, that they were both too efficient from a consumption standpoint to satisfy the goals of the oil oligarchs, that would be the motive. If there was a motive to destroy them, then neither of these destructions were the result of an engineering failure or design flaw. AND If neither of these were the result of an engineering failure or design flaw, then they could have been sound designs after all. Read on! Find out how they were superior to the transportation mechanisms that replaced them and are in use today!
There are, and always have been serious engineering anomalies regarding the Titanic and the Hindenburg and they have never been answered with anything more than scientific thoughts jotted down on paper and sold to the public. But it is time to point out that these stories, as accepted, have served to define our present day transportation mechanisms. Until we get out from under some misconceptions about steam and hydrogen power, we are doomed to wallow in the sea of petroleum-powered mechanisms.
Now, today, after reviewing the Hindenburg for 80 years, we are left with even more anomalies and lingering questions. Lucky for us, we have latest smoking-gun information regarding the burning of the Hindenburg.
The Hindenburg Connection
The Hindenburg was no ordinary flying machine. She utilized an effective form of anti-gravity and employed diesel engines, not ones that consumed high-octane aviation fuel. And neither was the Titanic an ordinary sea-going passenger carrier. She ran on coal at $1.00 per ton and could have run on any cheap fuel that would burn.
Today it is important that we learn about these events because the same corporate games are taking place and they have grown in size and attained even greater influence. Now, hang on for the second part of the story to learn why the Hindenburg also played a strategic role in the development of Trans-Atlantic Passenger service, and was very much in competition with flying mechanisms that are still used today. Could it be that both the Titanic and the Hindenburg were destroyed for the same reason (such as fuel efficiency beyond what the petrol oligarchs wanted)?
If we knew that one was deliberately destroyed (Titanic, which represented the most efficient sea travel), shouldn't we investigate the other (Hindenburg, which represented the most efficient air travel) to make sure that her demise was not engineered as well? What if I told you the analyses contained within this book reveals the same motive and a similar pattern of destruction!
If they were destroyed for the same reason, that they were both too efficient from a consumption standpoint to satisfy the goals of the oil oligarchs, that would be the motive. If there was a motive to destroy them, then neither of these destructions were the result of an engineering failure or design flaw. AND If neither of these were the result of an engineering failure or design flaw, then they could have been sound designs after all. Read on! Find out how they were superior to the transportation mechanisms that replaced them and are in use today!
There are, and always have been serious engineering anomalies regarding the Titanic and the Hindenburg and they have never been answered with anything more than scientific thoughts jotted down on paper and sold to the public. But it is time to point out that these stories, as accepted, have served to define our present day transportation mechanisms. Until we get out from under some misconceptions about steam and hydrogen power, we are doomed to wallow in the sea of petroleum-powered mechanisms.
Now, today, after reviewing the Hindenburg for 80 years, we are left with even more anomalies and lingering questions. Lucky for us, we have latest smoking-gun information regarding the burning of the Hindenburg.
|
|
A glimpse of the engineering genius of the Hindenburg reveals a human transport carrier years ahead of any other flying designs in 1936 and even today.
Here are just a few that are reviewed in the book:
Why was the public never shown one single photographic picture that showed the beginning of Hindenburg‘s fire even though there were 22 professional photographers at the event to film her docking?
Why were there so many photographers there to film the Hindenburg's arrival into Lakehurst, Va. when she had already completed 34 successful transatlantic crossings the prior year?
Why was a “static spark ” theory selected as Hindenburg’s nemesis when there was no evidence to support the occurrence of a static spark in the first place since it had never occurred in the four previous decades of flying hydrogen-filled zeppelins?
Why did all nations stop building rigid airships after the burning of the Hindenburg when she and Graf Zeppelin had clearly demonstrated an effective form of anti-gravity resulting in extreme fuel efficiency?
Why does hydrogen continue to be shunned as a gas that is flammable when modern airliners and passenger cars continue to carry a fuel that is not only volatile but even more dangerous?
Who better to tell the story of the demise of two historical transportation devices?
How about a person who has worked within the industry yet today has absolutely no association or contact with it? Kenneth has been out of the oil industry now for 30 years and has spent decades researching and documenting these mysteries and the writing he has produced is filled with many undeniable facts that will blow minds.
For those of you who have been reading outside of the mainstream box you have learned that much of what we originally were told about the JFK assassination, 911 Trade Tower demolition, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Oklahoma Federal building, etc. has been fully outed as a false narrative. As a result many now rightfully question the details related to these and many important events of the past. The destruction of the Titanic and the Hindenburg should now be in that category.
How about a person who has worked within the industry yet today has absolutely no association or contact with it? Kenneth has been out of the oil industry now for 30 years and has spent decades researching and documenting these mysteries and the writing he has produced is filled with many undeniable facts that will blow minds.
For those of you who have been reading outside of the mainstream box you have learned that much of what we originally were told about the JFK assassination, 911 Trade Tower demolition, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Oklahoma Federal building, etc. has been fully outed as a false narrative. As a result many now rightfully question the details related to these and many important events of the past. The destruction of the Titanic and the Hindenburg should now be in that category.
Two Tragedies, One Plan?
What's going on here with regard to type and consumption rates of fuel?
- Did you know that steam powered mechanisms can run off anything that will burn?
- Do you know that one ton of coal has the same thermal energy as 188 gallons of petroleum?
- Did you know that the Titanic could steam all the way from Southampton, Ireland to New York on 3,000 tons of coal while she moved 3,000 passengers? By the way, coal in that day was $1.00 per ton!
- Do you know that the Queen Elizabeth II requires over $240,000 per day in fuel oil to power her "modern" diesel generators, which results in 9 times what the Titanic would cost using coal to cross the Atlantic today?
- Did you know the Hindenburg was capable of flying around the world without stopping for fuel in 1936 and that the Graf Zeppelin circumnavigated the earth with 20 passengers in 1929?
- Do you know that one modern Airbus carries enough fuel to power the Hindenburg 6 times across the Atlantic?
- Did you ever notice that during the past 100 years the monopolization of automotive, aircraft and marine applications to a universal petroleum standard occurred worldwide?
Titanic and Hindenburg; Two Tragedies, One Plan provides and discusses the latest evidence surrounding the Titanic sinking and the Hindenburg burning to expose both of them for what they were; premeditated destructions similar to the 911 world trade tower demolitions of 2001. As a result, we are now traveling with the same kinds of mechanisms that steam and electricity had already replaced, but what's worse, the world is consuming petroleum at an astronomical rate. This is what made both the Titanic and the Hindenburg part of one sinister plan.
Titanic and Hindenburg; Two Tragedies, One Plan provides and discusses the latest evidence surrounding the Titanic sinking and the Hindenburg burning to expose both of them for what they were; premeditated destructions similar to the 911 world trade tower demolitions of 2001. As a result, we are now traveling with the same kinds of mechanisms that steam and electricity had already replaced, but what's worse, the world is consuming petroleum at an astronomical rate. This is what made both the Titanic and the Hindenburg part of one sinister plan.
In addition, The Rise And Stall Of The Piston Engine is available to tell the other half of the story. These two volumes are provided free to the public.
For mechanical, civil and transportation engineers wanting to stay abreast of available technology, such to move forward from the concept of petroleum powered mechanisms, The Rise and Stall of the Piston Engine is a must read! It contains examples of superior mechanisms from the past, like the Pogue 100 mile-per-gallon carburetor, and countless innovations that have been shelved to support the status quo of Big Oil.
Click on the book to find where to read it.